DBJP vs VXUS
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. DBJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBJP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $719M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 171 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +23.23% | +14.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +41.59% | +25.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.58% | +19.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.55% | +9.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
DBJP vs VXUS Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DBJP returned +41.59% while VXUS returned +25.63%. Year to date, DBJP is up 23.23% versus a gain of 14.98% for VXUS.
Over three years, DBJP compounded at +28.58% per year against +19.65% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +22.55% and +9.30% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, DBJP has the edge at +11.74% annualized vs +4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DBJP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBJP charges 0.45% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $5 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBJP currently yields 1.28% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
DBJP and VXUS share 152 holdings out of 7886 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBJP or VXUS?
DBJP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBJP or VXUS?
Over the past year DBJP returned +41.59% vs +25.63% for VXUS, so DBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DBJP annualized +11.74% vs +4.87% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBJP or VXUS?
DBJP has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: DBJP -35.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both DBJP and VXUS?
DBJP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBJP and VXUS?
DBJP and VXUS share 152 common holdings with a 9.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7886 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBJP or VXUS?
DBJP yields 1.28% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.