DBJP vs VYM
DBJP vs VYM
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. DBJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBJP | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $696M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +22.47% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +46.09% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.71% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.40% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
DBJP vs VYM Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DBJP returned +46.09% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, DBJP is up 22.47% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, DBJP compounded at +28.71% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +22.40% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, DBJP has the edge at +11.75% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DBJP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBJP charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBJP currently yields 1.25% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
DBJP and VYM share 0 holdings out of 727 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBJP or VYM?
DBJP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBJP or VYM?
Over the past year DBJP returned +46.09% vs +26.12% for VYM, so DBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DBJP annualized +11.75% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBJP or VYM?
DBJP has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: DBJP -35.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both DBJP and VYM?
DBJP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBJP and VYM?
DBJP and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 727 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBJP or VYM?
DBJP yields 1.25% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.