DBJP vs VOO
DBJP vs VOO
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DBJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBJP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $696M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +22.47% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +46.09% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.71% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.40% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
DBJP vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DBJP returned +46.09% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, DBJP is up 22.47% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, DBJP compounded at +28.71% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +22.40% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DBJP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBJP charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBJP currently yields 1.25% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
DBJP and VOO share 0 holdings out of 674 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBJP or VOO?
DBJP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBJP or VOO?
Over the past year DBJP returned +46.09% vs +23.71% for VOO, so DBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DBJP annualized +11.75% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBJP or VOO?
DBJP has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: DBJP -35.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both DBJP and VOO?
DBJP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBJP and VOO?
DBJP and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 674 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBJP or VOO?
DBJP yields 1.25% while VOO yields 1.09%, so DBJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.