DDIV vs VTI
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DDIV or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DDIV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 102 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.67% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.45% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.63% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.56% | +11.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,519 | $17,576Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2018 to Sep 17, 2026 (8 years).
DDIV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
DDIV vs VTI Performance
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DDIV returned +16.45% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, DDIV is up 7.67% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, DDIV compounded at +18.63% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.56% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.23% annualized vs +9.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 17.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.5% for DDIV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DDIV charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDIV currently yields 1.53% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.6% of DDIV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 5.7% of VTI's money is in holdings DDIV also owns.
Most of DDIV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in DDIV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 102 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,102 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DDIV (91.8% of the fund), and 1 for DDIV that do not appear in VTI (1.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DDIV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DINOHF Sinclair Corp | 4.44% | 0.02% | 4.42% |
| IVZInvesco PLC | 4.42% | 0.02% | 4.40% |
| BENFranklin Resources Inc. | 4.41% | 0.01% | 4.40% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 4.26% | 0.10% | 4.16% |
| LAMRLamar Advertising Co | 4.32% | 0.02% | 4.30% |
| CTRECaretrust Reit Inc Reit Usd.01 | 4.00% | 0.01% | 3.99% |
| EIXEdison Intl | 3.76% | 0.04% | 3.72% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 3.14% | 0.61% | 2.53% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 3.43% | 0.05% | 3.38% |
| PFGPrincipalfinancialgroupinc. | 3.37% | 0.03% | 3.34% |
96.6% of DDIV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DDIV or VTI?
DDIV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DDIV or VTI?
Over the past year DDIV returned +16.45% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DDIV annualized +9.22% vs +13.23% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DDIV or VTI?
DDIV has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 17.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DDIV -47.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both DDIV and VTI?
DDIV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DDIV and VTI?
96.6% of DDIV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 5.7% of VTI's is in holdings DDIV also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in DDIV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DDIV or VTI?
DDIV yields 1.53% while VTI yields 1.03%, so DDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DDIV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.