DFTT vs IVV

DFTT vs IVV

Which is better, DFTT or IVV?

Tactical Allocation against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDFTTIVV
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$31M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.14%1.06%
Holdings31508
YTD Return+19.36%Best+12.39%
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.38%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.51%
Top 10 Weight54.3%37.8%Best
Fund FamilyDonoghue Forlines ETFsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleTactical AllocationLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 11, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

DFTT vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

DFTT vs IVV Performance

DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) is an ETF from Donoghue Forlines ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, DFTT is up 19.36% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DFTT charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFTT currently yields 0.14% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

DFTT already in IVV95.2%
IVV already in DFTT29.1%

95.2% of DFTT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.1% of IVV's money is in holdings DFTT also owns.

Most of DFTT is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in DFTT and 490 in IVV, against full books of 31 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 454 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DFTT (69.6% of the fund), and 0 for DFTT that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DFTTWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp12.71%8.07%4.64%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A9.04%3.00%6.04%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc7.26%3.84%3.42%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.48%2.65%2.83%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.16%1.63%2.53%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.46%1.16%2.30%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp.3.45%1.01%2.44%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc3.15%0.47%2.68%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc2.90%0.35%2.55%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares2.51%0.66%1.85%

95.2% of DFTT is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

DFTTIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DFTT or IVV?

DFTT has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between DFTT and IVV?

95.2% of DFTT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 29.1% of IVV's is in holdings DFTT also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in DFTT and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, DFTT or IVV?

DFTT yields 0.14% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than DFTT?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.