DMAT vs QQQ
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DMAT delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMAT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $12M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +28.89% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +155.65% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.73% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DMAT vs QQQ Performance
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, DMAT is up 28.89% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, DMAT compounded at +23.73% per year against +26.08% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for DMAT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMAT charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMAT currently yields 0.90% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DMAT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 150 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMAT or QQQ?
DMAT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMAT or QQQ?
Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so DMAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DMAT annualized +12.91% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMAT or QQQ?
DMAT has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: DMAT -53.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DMAT and QQQ?
DMAT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMAT and QQQ?
DMAT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 150 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMAT or QQQ?
DMAT yields 0.90% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DMAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.