DMAT vs VOO
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DMAT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMAT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +28.89% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +155.65% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.73% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
DMAT vs VOO Performance
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, DMAT is up 28.89% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, DMAT compounded at +23.73% per year against +22.19% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +12.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for DMAT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMAT charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMAT currently yields 0.90% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMAT or VOO?
DMAT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMAT or VOO?
Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% vs +21.79% for VOO, so DMAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DMAT annualized +12.91% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMAT or VOO?
DMAT has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: DMAT -53.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both DMAT and VOO?
DMAT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMAT and VOO?
DMAT and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMAT or VOO?
DMAT yields 0.90% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.