DMAT vs SCHD
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. DMAT delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMAT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $12M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +28.89% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +155.65% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.73% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | Oct 20, 2011 |
DMAT vs SCHD Performance
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, DMAT is up 28.89% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, DMAT compounded at +23.73% per year against +16.29% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, DMAT has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for DMAT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMAT charges 0.59% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $6 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMAT currently yields 0.90% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
DMAT and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 148 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMAT or SCHD?
DMAT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMAT or SCHD?
Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so DMAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DMAT annualized +12.91% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMAT or SCHD?
DMAT has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: DMAT -53.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both DMAT and SCHD?
DMAT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMAT and SCHD?
DMAT and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 148 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMAT or SCHD?
DMAT yields 0.90% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.