DMAT vs VXUS
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. DMAT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMAT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $12M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +28.89% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +155.65% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.73% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
DMAT vs VXUS Performance
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, DMAT is up 28.89% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, DMAT compounded at +23.73% per year against +20.34% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, DMAT has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for DMAT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMAT charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMAT currently yields 0.90% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
DMAT and VXUS share 31 holdings out of 7886 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMAT or VXUS?
DMAT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMAT or VXUS?
Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so DMAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DMAT annualized +12.91% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMAT or VXUS?
DMAT has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: DMAT -53.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both DMAT and VXUS?
DMAT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMAT and VXUS?
DMAT and VXUS share 31 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7886 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMAT or VXUS?
DMAT yields 0.90% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.