DMAT vs VYM
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. DMAT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMAT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $12M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +28.89% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +155.65% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.73% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
DMAT vs VYM Performance
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, DMAT is up 28.89% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, DMAT compounded at +23.73% per year against +19.03% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, DMAT has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for DMAT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMAT charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMAT currently yields 0.90% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMAT or VYM?
DMAT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMAT or VYM?
Over the past year DMAT returned +155.65% vs +24.22% for VYM, so DMAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DMAT annualized +12.91% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMAT or VYM?
DMAT has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: DMAT -53.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both DMAT and VYM?
DMAT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMAT and VYM?
DMAT and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 649 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMAT or VYM?
DMAT yields 0.90% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.