DRN vs VTI

DRN vs VTI

Which is better, DRN or VTI?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDRNVTI
Expense Ratio0.98%0.03%Best
AUM$43M$666.9B
Dividend Yield1.87%1.07%
Holdings363,543
YTD Return+20.60%Best+13.59%
1Y Return+9.84%+20.00%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+8.45%+20.95%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-15.02%+11.81%Best
Volatility (annualized)53.3%14.8%Best
Max Drawdown-86.3%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$4,432$17,474Best
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 16, 2009May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 16, 2009 to Sep 4, 2026 (17.1 years).

DRN vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.1 years both funds cover.

DRN vs VTI Performance

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF (DRN) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DRN returned +9.84% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, DRN is up 20.60% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.

Over three years, DRN compounded at +8.45% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -15.02% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs +11.19%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.3% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.3% for DRN and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DRN charges 0.98% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRN currently yields 1.87% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

DRN already in VTI65.6%

At least 65.6% of DRN's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

26 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in DRN and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 36 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 33 and 2,787 positions we hold weights for.

VTI holds 659 positions DRN does not, 90.2% of the fund.

Largest: NVDA 6.32%, AAPL 5.84%, MSFT 3.81%, AMZN 3.17%, GOOGL 2.88%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DRNWeight in VTIDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.7.67%0.22%7.45%
PLDPrologis Inc6.08%0.17%5.91%
EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust4.87%0.14%4.73%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation3.83%0.10%3.73%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.3.52%0.09%3.43%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc3.44%0.09%3.35%
PSAPublic Storage3.33%0.07%3.26%
ORealty Income Corp.3.15%0.08%3.07%
VTRVentas  Inc .3.13%0.06%3.07%
CBRECBRE group3.13%0.05%3.08%

65.6% of DRN is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

DRNVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DRN or VTI?

DRN has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DRN or VTI?

Over the past year DRN returned +9.84% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), DRN annualized +11.19% vs +13.43% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DRN or VTI?

DRN has been the more volatile fund at 53.3% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DRN -86.3% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both DRN and VTI?

DRN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between DRN and VTI?

At least 65.6% of DRN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in DRN and 2,787 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, DRN or VTI?

DRN yields 1.87% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than DRN?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.