EAFG vs VTI
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EAFG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.03% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 114 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.75% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.54% | +17.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $12,943 | $14,870Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.5 years).
EAFG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
EAFG vs VTI Performance
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAFG returned +16.54% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, EAFG is up 7.75% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EAFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 12.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for EAFG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFG charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFG currently yields 2.03% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 103 holdings in EAFG and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.7% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in EAFG and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 114 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EAFG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFG or VTI?
EAFG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EAFG or VTI?
Over the past year EAFG returned +16.54% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EAFG or VTI?
EAFG has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 12.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EAFG -16.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both EAFG and VTI?
EAFG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFG or VTI?
EAFG yields 2.03% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EAFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EAFG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.