EAFG vs VXUS
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, EAFG or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFG | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.03% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 114 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +10.80% | +16.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.17% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 11.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $13,341 | $15,830Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2.5 years).
EAFG vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
EAFG vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAFG returned +22.17% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, EAFG is up 10.80% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EAFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 11.2% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for EAFG and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFG charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFG currently yields 2.03% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 76.0% of EAFG's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of EAFG is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in EAFG and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 114 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EAFG | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv | 3.10% | 1.70% | 1.40% |
| 5016:JPJx Advanced Metals Corp Common Stock | 4.01% | 0.03% | 3.98% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Limited | 3.45% | 0.47% | 2.98% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 3.46% | 0.33% | 3.13% |
| 6920:JPLasertec Corp | 3.43% | 0.05% | 3.38% |
| VACN:SMVat Group Ag Common Stock Chf 0.1 | 3.39% | 0.05% | 3.34% |
| 6723:JPRenesas Electronics Corp. Com Stk | 2.47% | 0.11% | 2.36% |
| BESI:ASBe Semiconductor Industr /EUR/ | 2.53% | 0.05% | 2.48% |
| FRES:LNFresnillo Plc | 2.47% | 0.01% | 2.46% |
| EVN:AUEvolution Mining Limited Ordinary Fully Paid | 2.17% | 0.04% | 2.13% |
76.0% of EAFG is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFG or VXUS?
EAFG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EAFG or VXUS?
Over the past year EAFG returned +22.17% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EAFG or VXUS?
EAFG has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 11.2% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EAFG -16.5% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both EAFG and VXUS?
EAFG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EAFG and VXUS?
At least 76.0% of EAFG's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in EAFG and 8,094 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFG or VXUS?
EAFG yields 2.03% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than EAFG?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.