EAFG vs VXUS
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.03% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.81% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.05% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EAFG vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAFG returned +23.05% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, EAFG is up 11.81% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EAFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for EAFG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFG charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFG currently yields 2.03% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EAFG and VXUS share 65 holdings out of 7907 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFG or VXUS?
EAFG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EAFG or VXUS?
Over the past year EAFG returned +23.05% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EAFG annualized +12.95% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EAFG or VXUS?
EAFG has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EAFG -16.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EAFG and VXUS?
EAFG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between EAFG and VXUS?
EAFG and VXUS share 65 common holdings with a 7.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7907 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFG or VXUS?
EAFG yields 2.03% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.