EAFG vs QQQ
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.03% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +10.93% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.83% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EAFG vs QQQ Performance
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EAFG returned +21.83% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, EAFG is up 10.93% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.9% for EAFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for EAFG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFG charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFG currently yields 2.03% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EAFG and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 205 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFG or QQQ?
EAFG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EAFG or QQQ?
Over the past year EAFG returned +21.83% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EAFG annualized +12.49% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EAFG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.9% for EAFG. Worst drawdown: EAFG -16.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EAFG and QQQ?
EAFG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EAFG and QQQ?
EAFG and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 205 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFG or QQQ?
EAFG yields 2.03% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EAFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.