EAFG vs VOO
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EAFG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EAFG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.03% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.93% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.83% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EAFG vs VOO Performance
Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EAFG returned +21.83% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, EAFG is up 10.93% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EAFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for EAFG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EAFG charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EAFG currently yields 2.03% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EAFG and VOO share 0 holdings out of 608 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EAFG or VOO?
EAFG has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EAFG or VOO?
Over the past year EAFG returned +21.83% vs +20.92% for VOO, so EAFG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EAFG annualized +12.49% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EAFG or VOO?
EAFG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EAFG -16.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EAFG and VOO?
EAFG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EAFG and VOO?
EAFG and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 608 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EAFG or VOO?
EAFG yields 2.03% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EAFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.