EASG vs IVV
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EASG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $69M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 361 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.74% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.25% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.05% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
EASG vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF (EASG) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EASG returned +20.25% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, EASG is up 12.74% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, EASG compounded at +16.05% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.55% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, EASG has the edge at +9.16% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for EASG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EASG charges 0.14% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EASG currently yields 3.82% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EASG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EASG or IVV?
EASG has an expense ratio of 0.14% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EASG or IVV?
Over the past year EASG returned +20.25% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EASG annualized +9.16% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EASG or IVV?
EASG has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EASG -32.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EASG and IVV?
EASG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EASG and IVV?
EASG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EASG or IVV?
EASG yields 3.82% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.