EASG vs QQQ
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
EASG has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. EASG offers more diversification with 361 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EASG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $69M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 361 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.23% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.59% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.88% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.56% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EASG vs QQQ Performance
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF (EASG) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EASG returned +17.59% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, EASG is up 11.23% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, EASG compounded at +15.88% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.56% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.3% for EASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for EASG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EASG charges 0.14% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $18 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EASG currently yields 3.82% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EASG and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 459 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EASG or QQQ?
EASG has an expense ratio of 0.14% while QQQ charges 0.18%. EASG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EASG or QQQ?
Over the past year EASG returned +17.59% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EASG annualized +8.95% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EASG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.3% for EASG. Worst drawdown: EASG -32.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EASG and QQQ?
EASG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EASG and QQQ?
EASG and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 459 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EASG or QQQ?
EASG yields 3.82% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.