EASG vs VTI
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EASG or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. EASG is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EASG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $68M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.75% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 361 | 3,543 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 7.9 years | $19,484 | $29,266Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 12 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EASG has data through Sep 11, 2026 and VTI through Sep 23, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (7.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.2% for EASG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for EASG and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EASG charges 0.14% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EASG currently yields 3.75% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.8% of EASG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings EASG also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 356 positions we hold weights for in EASG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 361 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EASG (97.4% of the fund), and 4 for EASG that do not appear in VTI (1.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EASG and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EASG or VTI?
EASG has an expense ratio of 0.14% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EASG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.2% for EASG. Worst drawdown: EASG -32.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EASG and VTI?
EASG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EASG or VTI?
EASG yields 3.75% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EASG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. EASG is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.