EASG vs VTI
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EASG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $69M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 361 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.74% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.25% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.05% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
EASG vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF (EASG) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EASG returned +20.25% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, EASG is up 12.74% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, EASG compounded at +16.05% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.55% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, EASG has the edge at +9.16% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for EASG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EASG charges 0.14% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EASG currently yields 3.82% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EASG and VTI share 2 holdings out of 3142 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EASG or VTI?
EASG has an expense ratio of 0.14% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EASG or VTI?
Over the past year EASG returned +20.25% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EASG annualized +9.16% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EASG or VTI?
EASG has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EASG -32.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EASG and VTI?
EASG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EASG and VTI?
EASG and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3142 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EASG or VTI?
EASG yields 3.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.