EASG vs VYM
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EASG or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. EASG is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EASG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $68M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.75% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 361 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 7.9 years | $19,484 | $22,953Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.5%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 14 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. EASG has data through Sep 11, 2026 and VYM through Sep 25, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (7.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EASG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for EASG and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EASG charges 0.14% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $4 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EASG currently yields 3.75% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 356 holdings in EASG and 557 in VYM, totalling 99.3% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 356 positions we hold weights for in EASG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 361 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EASG (97.1% of the fund), and 6 for EASG that do not appear in VYM (2.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EASG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EASG or VYM?
EASG has an expense ratio of 0.14% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, EASG or VYM?
EASG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EASG -32.3% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both EASG and VYM?
EASG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EASG or VYM?
EASG yields 3.75% while VYM yields 2.22%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EASG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. EASG is less concentrated, with 22.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.