EBIT vs VOO
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EBIT delivered stronger 1-year returns. EBIT offers more diversification with 642 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EBIT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.68% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 642 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.91% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.61% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EBIT vs VOO Performance
Harbor AlphaEdge Small Cap Earners ETF (EBIT) is a ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EBIT returned +25.61% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, EBIT is up 20.91% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EBIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for EBIT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EBIT charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EBIT currently yields 1.68% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EBIT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1146 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EBIT or VOO?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EBIT or VOO?
Over the past year EBIT returned +25.61% vs +21.79% for VOO, so EBIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EBIT annualized +17.64% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EBIT or VOO?
EBIT has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EBIT -26.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EBIT and VOO?
EBIT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EBIT and VOO?
EBIT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1146 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EBIT or VOO?
EBIT yields 1.68% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EBIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.