ECOW vs IVV
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ECOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECOW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $221M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.45% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.87% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.55% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.20% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.68% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
ECOW vs IVV Performance
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ECOW returned +23.55% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ECOW is up 11.87% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ECOW compounded at +18.20% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.68% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.3% for ECOW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECOW charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECOW currently yields 4.45% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ECOW and IVV share 0 holdings out of 615 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECOW or IVV?
ECOW has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECOW or IVV?
Over the past year ECOW returned +23.55% vs +20.94% for IVV, so ECOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ECOW annualized +5.53% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECOW or IVV?
ECOW has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ECOW -41.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ECOW and IVV?
ECOW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECOW and IVV?
ECOW and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 615 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECOW or IVV?
ECOW yields 4.45% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ECOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.