ECOW vs VOO
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ECOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECOW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $218M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.62% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 117 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.35% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.99% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.72% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.00% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ECOW vs VOO Performance
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECOW returned +23.99% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, ECOW is up 11.35% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, ECOW compounded at +17.72% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.00% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.3% for ECOW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECOW charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECOW currently yields 4.62% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ECOW and VOO share 0 holdings out of 616 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECOW or VOO?
ECOW has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECOW or VOO?
Over the past year ECOW returned +23.99% vs +22.62% for VOO, so ECOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ECOW annualized +5.49% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECOW or VOO?
ECOW has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ECOW -41.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ECOW and VOO?
ECOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECOW and VOO?
ECOW and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 616 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECOW or VOO?
ECOW yields 4.62% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ECOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.