ECOW vs VXUS
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, ECOW or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECOW | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $225M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.45% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 119 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +10.55% | +13.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.92% | +21.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.92% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.56% | +9.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.3% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,396 | $15,499Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 2, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 6, 2019 to Sep 25, 2026 (7.4 years).
ECOW vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
ECOW vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECOW returned +16.92% while VXUS returned +21.98%. Year to date, ECOW is up 10.55% versus a gain of 13.44% for VXUS.
Over three years, ECOW compounded at +17.92% per year against +20.89% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.56% and +9.16% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +9.31% annualized vs +5.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 16.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.3% for ECOW and -35.1% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECOW charges 0.70% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $5 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECOW currently yields 4.45% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 81.3% of ECOW's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of ECOW is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
82 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ECOW and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 119 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ECOW | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TUPRS:TRTurkiye Petrol Rafinerileri As | 2.84% | 0.01% | 2.83% |
| GFI:ZAGold Fields Ltd | 2.46% | 0.06% | 2.40% |
| EAND:AEEmirates Telecommunications Group Co PJSC | 2.25% | 0.04% | 2.21% |
| PETR3:BVPetroleo Brasileiro Sa Petr | 2.13% | 0.08% | 2.05% |
| PE.OLES:MXIndustrias Penoles Sab De Cv | 2.15% | 0.02% | 2.13% |
| AXIA3:BVAxia Energia Sa | 2.03% | 0.03% | 2.00% |
| FEMSAUBD:MXFomento Economico Mexicano Sab De Cv | 1.92% | 0.05% | 1.87% |
| ADNOCGAS:AEAdnoc Gas Plc | 1.95% | 0.01% | 1.94% |
| 175:HKGeely Automobile Holdings Ltd | 1.88% | 0.04% | 1.84% |
| LTM:CLLatam Airlines Group Sa | 1.87% | 0.02% | 1.85% |
81.3% of ECOW is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECOW or VXUS?
ECOW has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECOW or VXUS?
Over the past year ECOW returned +16.92% vs +21.98% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ECOW annualized +5.29% vs +9.31% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECOW or VXUS?
ECOW has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 16.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: ECOW -41.3% vs VXUS -35.1%.
Should I hold both ECOW and VXUS?
ECOW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ECOW and VXUS?
At least 81.3% of ECOW's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 82 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in ECOW and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECOW or VXUS?
ECOW yields 4.45% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so ECOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than ECOW?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.