EDOG vs IVV
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDOG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $29M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.93% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.51% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.48% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.59% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.73% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
EDOG vs IVV Performance
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EDOG returned +15.48% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, EDOG is up 5.51% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, EDOG compounded at +11.59% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.73% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.3% for EDOG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDOG charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDOG currently yields 4.93% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EDOG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 554 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDOG or IVV?
EDOG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDOG or IVV?
Over the past year EDOG returned +15.48% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EDOG annualized +2.32% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDOG or IVV?
EDOG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EDOG -52.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EDOG and IVV?
EDOG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDOG and IVV?
EDOG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 554 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDOG or IVV?
EDOG yields 4.93% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.