EDOG vs SCHD
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, EDOG or SCHD?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EDOG is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDOG | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.93% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 50 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +7.53% | +27.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.93% | +30.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.36% | +16.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.32% | +10.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -52.3% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,958 | $16,274Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.6%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2014 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2014 to Sep 4, 2026 (12.4 years).
EDOG vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.4 years both funds cover.
EDOG vs SCHD Performance
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EDOG returned +16.93% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, EDOG is up 7.53% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, EDOG compounded at +12.36% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +5.32% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +10.49% annualized vs +2.47%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.4% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.3% for EDOG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDOG charges 0.60% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $6 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDOG currently yields 4.93% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 49 holdings in EDOG and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in EDOG and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 50 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for EDOG (99.9% of the fund), and 1 for EDOG that do not appear in SCHD (2.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDOG and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDOG or SCHD?
EDOG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EDOG or SCHD?
Over the past year EDOG returned +16.93% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EDOG annualized +2.47% vs +10.49% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EDOG or SCHD?
EDOG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.4% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EDOG -52.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EDOG and SCHD?
EDOG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDOG or SCHD?
EDOG yields 4.93% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so EDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than EDOG?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EDOG is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.