EDOG vs VOO
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EDOG or VOO?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EDOG is less concentrated, with 29.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDOG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.80% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 50 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +6.51% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.01% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.95% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.48% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -52.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,057 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2014 to Sep 10, 2026 (12.5 years).
EDOG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.5 years both funds cover.
EDOG vs VOO Performance
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDOG returned +13.01% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, EDOG is up 6.51% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, EDOG compounded at +11.95% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.48% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +12.70% annualized vs +2.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.3% for EDOG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDOG charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDOG currently yields 4.80% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 49 holdings in EDOG and 505 in VOO, totalling 99.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, EDOG as of Aug 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in EDOG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 50 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EDOG (99.4% of the fund), and 2 for EDOG that do not appear in VOO (6.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDOG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDOG or VOO?
EDOG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EDOG or VOO?
Over the past year EDOG returned +13.01% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), EDOG annualized +2.38% vs +12.70% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EDOG or VOO?
EDOG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EDOG -52.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EDOG and VOO?
EDOG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDOG or VOO?
EDOG yields 4.80% while VOO yields 1.04%, so EDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EDOG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EDOG is less concentrated, with 29.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.