EDOG vs VTI
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDOG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $29M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.93% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.51% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.48% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.59% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.73% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
EDOG vs VTI Performance
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDOG returned +15.48% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, EDOG is up 5.51% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, EDOG compounded at +11.59% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.73% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.3% for EDOG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDOG charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDOG currently yields 4.93% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EDOG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2836 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDOG or VTI?
EDOG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDOG or VTI?
Over the past year EDOG returned +15.48% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EDOG annualized +2.32% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDOG or VTI?
EDOG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EDOG -52.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EDOG and VTI?
EDOG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDOG and VTI?
EDOG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2836 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDOG or VTI?
EDOG yields 4.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.