EDOG vs QQQ
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDOG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $29M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.93% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.51% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.48% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.59% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.73% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2014 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EDOG vs QQQ Performance
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EDOG returned +15.48% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, EDOG is up 5.51% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, EDOG compounded at +11.59% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.73% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.4% for EDOG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.3% for EDOG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDOG charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDOG currently yields 4.93% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EDOG and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDOG or QQQ?
EDOG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDOG or QQQ?
Over the past year EDOG returned +15.48% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), EDOG annualized +2.32% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDOG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.4% for EDOG. Worst drawdown: EDOG -52.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EDOG and QQQ?
EDOG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDOG and QQQ?
EDOG and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDOG or QQQ?
EDOG yields 4.93% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.