EDV vs VTI
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -3.17% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.30% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -3.77% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.21% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
EDV vs VTI Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -1.30% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, EDV is down 3.17% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -3.77% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -12.21% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.08% annualized vs -1.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VTI?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VTI?
Over the past year EDV returned -1.30% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.34% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VTI?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EDV and VTI?
EDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VTI?
EDV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VTI?
EDV yields 5.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.