EDV vs IVV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -4.81% | +12.39% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.98% | +20.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.28% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.70% | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
EDV vs IVV Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EDV returned -2.98% while IVV returned +20.24%. Year to date, EDV is down 4.81% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.28% per year against +21.78% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -12.70% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -1.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.10. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and IVV share 0 holdings out of 581 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or IVV?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or IVV?
Over the past year EDV returned -2.98% vs +20.24% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EDV annualized -1.43% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or IVV?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EDV and IVV?
EDV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.10, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and IVV?
EDV and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 581 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or IVV?
EDV yields 5.42% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.