EDV vs VOO

EDV vs VOO

Which is better, EDV or VOO?

Long Term Government Bond against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEDVVOO
Expense Ratio0.05%0.03%Best
AUM$3.8B$997.4B
Dividend Yield5.42%1.04%
Holdings83509
YTD Return-6.65%+12.50%Best
1Y Return-10.79%+17.58%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-4.49%+21.27%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-13.09%+12.95%Best
Volatility (annualized)19.8%14.1%Best
Max Drawdown-62.0%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$4,958$18,384Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term Government BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 6, 2007Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16 years).

EDV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.

EDV vs VOO Performance

Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -10.79% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, EDV is down 6.65% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.49% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -13.09% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs -1.85%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EDV charges 0.05% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EDV and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EDVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EDV or VOO?

EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EDV or VOO?

Over the past year EDV returned -10.79% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDV annualized -1.85% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EDV or VOO?

EDV has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both EDV and VOO?

EDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VOO?

EDV yields 5.42% while VOO yields 1.04%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than EDV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.