EEMV vs IVV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EEMV or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EEMV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EEMV is less concentrated, with 14.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.7B | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 330 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.79%Best | +12.70% |
| 1Y Return | +22.59%Best | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.95% | +21.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.13% | +12.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 14.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,465 | $18,221Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.8%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 8, 2026 (14.9 years).
EEMV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
EEMV vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EEMV returned +22.59% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, EEMV is up 17.79% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, EEMV compounded at +14.95% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.13% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.75% annualized vs +5.64%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 12.5% for EEMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for EEMV and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMV charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMV currently yields 2.28% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of EEMV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EEMV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 296 positions we hold weights for in EEMV and 504 in IVV, against full books of 330 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EEMV (99.0% of the fund), and 3 for EEMV that do not appear in IVV (0.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEMV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.31% | 0.18% | 0.13% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EEMV and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMV or IVV?
EEMV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EEMV or IVV?
Over the past year EEMV returned +22.59% vs +19.36% for IVV, so EEMV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMV annualized +5.64% vs +13.75% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EEMV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 12.5% for EEMV. Worst drawdown: EEMV -36.7% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EEMV and IVV?
EEMV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMV or IVV?
EEMV yields 2.28% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EEMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EEMV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EEMV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EEMV is less concentrated, with 14.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.