EEMV vs IVV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.6B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 326 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +15.35% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.23% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.41% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.52% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
EEMV vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EEMV returned +20.23% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, EEMV is up 15.35% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, EEMV compounded at +14.41% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.52% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.5% for EEMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for EEMV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMV charges 0.26% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $3 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMV currently yields 2.28% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EEMV and IVV share 1 holdings out of 798 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEMV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.25% | 0.15% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMV or IVV?
EEMV has an expense ratio of 0.26% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMV or IVV?
Over the past year EEMV returned +20.23% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMV annualized +5.52% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.5% for EEMV. Worst drawdown: EEMV -36.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EEMV and IVV?
EEMV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMV and IVV?
EEMV and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 798 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMV or IVV?
EEMV yields 2.28% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EEMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.