EEMV vs VXUS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, EEMV or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMV | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $3.7B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 330 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +18.62%Best | +16.15% |
| 1Y Return | +24.44% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.46% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.15% | +9.09%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7%Best | -39.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,477 | $15,450Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 4, 2026 (14.9 years).
EEMV vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
EEMV vs VXUS Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEMV returned +24.44% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, EEMV is up 18.62% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Over three years, EEMV compounded at +15.46% per year against +20.48% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.15% and +9.09% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +6.18% annualized vs +5.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 12.5% for EEMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for EEMV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMV charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMV currently yields 2.28% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 65.6% of EEMV's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
198 positions in common, counted across the 296 positions we hold weights for in EEMV and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 330 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEMV | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix | 1.39% | 2.17% | 0.78% |
| 009150:KRSamsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd | 1.85% | 0.18% | 1.67% |
| 2059:TWKing Slide Works Company Ltd | 1.67% | 0.03% | 1.64% |
| 2303:TWUnited Microelectronics Corp | 1.42% | 0.13% | 1.29% |
| 3988:HKBank Of China Ltd. | 1.44% | 0.10% | 1.34% |
| 601398:SHIndustrial & Commercial Bank Of China Ltd | 1.33% | 0.15% | 1.18% |
| 2308:TWDelta Electronics Inc | 1.21% | 0.27% | 0.94% |
| TCS:MBTata Consultancy Services Ltd | 1.37% | 0.05% | 1.32% |
| 2412:TWChunghwa Telecom Co. Ltd. | 1.22% | 0.04% | 1.18% |
| 2345:TWAccton Technology Corp Common Stock Twd 10 | 1.06% | 0.09% | 0.97% |
65.6% of EEMV is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMV or VXUS?
EEMV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EEMV or VXUS?
Over the past year EEMV returned +24.44% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMV annualized +5.70% vs +6.18% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EEMV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 12.5% for EEMV. Worst drawdown: EEMV -36.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EEMV and VXUS?
EEMV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMV and VXUS?
At least 65.6% of EEMV's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 198 positions in common, counted across the 296 positions we hold weights for in EEMV and 8,094 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMV or VXUS?
EEMV yields 2.28% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than EEMV?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.