EEMV vs VYM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3.6B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 326 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +15.62% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.79% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.24% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.27% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EEMV vs VYM Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEMV returned +20.79% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, EEMV is up 15.62% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, EEMV compounded at +14.24% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.27% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.5% for EEMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for EEMV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMV charges 0.26% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $4 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMV currently yields 2.28% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EEMV and VYM share 1 holdings out of 896 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EEMV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | 0.85% | 0.11% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMV or VYM?
EEMV has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMV or VYM?
Over the past year EEMV returned +20.79% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMV annualized +5.54% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMV or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.5% for EEMV. Worst drawdown: EEMV -36.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EEMV and VYM?
EEMV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMV and VYM?
EEMV and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 896 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMV or VYM?
EEMV yields 2.28% while VYM yields 2.24%, so EEMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.