EEMV vs VTI
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.6B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 326 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.63% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.07% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.18% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.26% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
EEMV vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EEMV returned +19.07% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, EEMV is up 14.63% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, EEMV compounded at +14.18% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.26% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs +5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.5% for EEMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for EEMV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMV charges 0.26% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $3 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMV currently yields 2.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EEMV and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3081 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMV or VTI?
EEMV has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMV or VTI?
Over the past year EEMV returned +19.07% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMV annualized +5.47% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.5% for EEMV. Worst drawdown: EEMV -36.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EEMV and VTI?
EEMV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMV and VTI?
EEMV and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3081 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMV or VTI?
EEMV yields 2.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EEMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.