EEMV vs QQQ
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EEMV or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EEMV is less concentrated, with 15.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $3.6B | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.14% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 326 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +14.43% | +21.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.73% | +23.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.73% | +27.86%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.94% | +16.25%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,344 | $21,231Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.2%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Oct 1, 2026 (14.9 years).
EEMV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EEMV vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EEMV returned +17.73% while QQQ returned +23.58%. Year to date, EEMV is up 14.43% versus a gain of 21.44% for QQQ.
Over three years, EEMV compounded at +14.73% per year against +27.86% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +5.94% and +16.25% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.05% annualized vs +5.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 12.5% for EEMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for EEMV and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMV charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMV currently yields 2.14% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 295 holdings in EEMV and 102 in QQQ, totalling 100.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 295 positions we hold weights for in EEMV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 326 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EEMV (97.8% of the fund), and 6 for EEMV that do not appear in QQQ (3.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EEMV and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMV or QQQ?
EEMV has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EEMV or QQQ?
Over the past year EEMV returned +17.73% vs +23.58% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMV annualized +5.41% vs +19.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EEMV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 12.5% for EEMV. Worst drawdown: EEMV -36.7% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both EEMV and QQQ?
EEMV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMV or QQQ?
EEMV yields 2.14% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so EEMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EEMV?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EEMV is less concentrated, with 15.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.