EEMV vs QQQ
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. EEMV offers more diversification with 326 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EEMV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3.6B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 326 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +15.35% | +17.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.23% | +26.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.41% | +26.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.52% | +15.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2011 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EEMV vs QQQ Performance
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EEMV returned +20.23% while QQQ returned +26.39%. Year to date, EEMV is up 15.35% versus a gain of 17.07% for QQQ.
Over three years, EEMV compounded at +14.41% per year against +26.08% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.52% and +15.18% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.05% annualized vs +5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.5% for EEMV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for EEMV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EEMV charges 0.26% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $18 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EEMV currently yields 2.28% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EEMV and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 396 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EEMV or QQQ?
EEMV has an expense ratio of 0.26% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EEMV or QQQ?
Over the past year EEMV returned +20.23% vs +26.39% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EEMV annualized +5.52% vs +13.05% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EEMV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.5% for EEMV. Worst drawdown: EEMV -36.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EEMV and QQQ?
EEMV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EEMV and QQQ?
EEMV and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 396 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EEMV or QQQ?
EEMV yields 2.28% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EEMV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.