EFRA vs IVV
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EFRA or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFRA | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +4.28% | +13.85%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.67% | +18.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.86% | +23.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $15,667 | $21,996Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.8% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2022 to Sep 25, 2026 (3.9 years).
EFRA vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
EFRA vs IVV Performance
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EFRA returned +7.67% while IVV returned +18.57%. Year to date, EFRA is up 4.28% versus a gain of 13.85% for IVV.
Over three years, EFRA compounded at +12.86% per year against +23.50% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +22.40% annualized vs +12.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFRA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for EFRA and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFRA charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFRA currently yields 4.07% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
21.2% of EFRA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings EFRA also owns.
EFRA and IVV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in EFRA and 490 in IVV, against full books of 102 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EFRA (98.4% of the fund), and 16 for EFRA that do not appear in IVV (36.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.2% of EFRA is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFRA or IVV?
EFRA has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFRA or IVV?
Over the past year EFRA returned +7.67% vs +18.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EFRA annualized +12.20% vs +22.40% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFRA or IVV?
EFRA has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EFRA -17.9% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both EFRA and IVV?
EFRA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EFRA and IVV?
21.2% of EFRA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.3% of IVV's is in holdings EFRA also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 80 positions we hold weights for in EFRA and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFRA or IVV?
EFRA yields 4.07% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EFRA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EFRA?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.