EFU vs IVV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.01% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -22.65% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -34.19% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -26.53% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -17.12% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
EFU vs IVV Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EFU returned -34.19% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, EFU is down 22.65% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, EFU compounded at -26.53% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -17.12% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -20.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.5% for EFU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFU charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFU currently yields 5.01% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFU or IVV?
EFU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFU or IVV?
Over the past year EFU returned -34.19% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EFU annualized -20.40% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFU or IVV?
EFU has been the more volatile fund at 33.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EFU -99.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EFU and IVV?
EFU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFU or IVV?
EFU yields 5.01% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EFU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.