EFU vs IVV

EFU vs IVV

Which is better, EFU or IVV?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.81, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEFUIVV
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$876.4B
Dividend Yield5.17%1.06%
Holdings4508
YTD Return-17.66%+12.39%Best
1Y Return-25.10%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-25.82%+21.38%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-16.60%+13.51%Best
Volatility (annualized)33.2%15.7%Best
Max Drawdown--56.0%
$10,000 over 5 years$4,035$18,844Best
Fund FamilyProSharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 23, 2007May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 25, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.9 years).

EFU vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.9 years both funds cover.

EFU vs IVV Performance

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EFU returned -25.10% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, EFU is down 17.66% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.

Over three years, EFU compounded at -25.82% per year against +21.38% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -16.60% and +13.51% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.38% annualized vs -20.03%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EFU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EFU charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFU currently yields 5.17% against 1.06% for IVV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EFU and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EFUIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EFU or IVV?

EFU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EFU or IVV?

Over the past year EFU returned -25.10% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EFU annualized -20.03% vs +9.38% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EFU or IVV?

EFU has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV.

Should I hold both EFU and IVV?

EFU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EFU or IVV?

EFU yields 5.17% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EFU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than EFU?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.81, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.