EFU vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.17% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -22.12% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -30.81% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -26.49% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -16.87% | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EFU vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFU returned -30.81% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, EFU is down 22.12% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Over three years, EFU compounded at -26.49% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -16.87% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs -20.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.5% for EFU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.82. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFU charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFU currently yields 5.17% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFU or VOO?
EFU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFU or VOO?
Over the past year EFU returned -30.81% vs +19.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EFU annualized -20.32% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFU or VOO?
EFU has been the more volatile fund at 33.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EFU -99.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EFU and VOO?
EFU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFU or VOO?
EFU yields 5.17% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EFU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.