EFU vs VTI

EFU vs VTI

Which is better, EFU or VTI?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.81, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEFUVTI
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$666.9B
Dividend Yield5.17%1.03%
Holdings43,543
YTD Return-17.66%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-25.10%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-25.82%+21.01%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-16.60%+12.36%Best
Volatility (annualized)33.2%16.1%Best
Max Drawdown--56.2%
$10,000 over 5 years$4,035$17,908Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 23, 2007May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 25, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.9 years).

EFU vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.9 years both funds cover.

EFU vs VTI Performance

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EFU returned -25.10% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, EFU is down 17.66% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Over three years, EFU compounded at -25.82% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -16.60% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.31% annualized vs -20.03%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EFU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 16.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EFU charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFU currently yields 5.17% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EFU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EFUVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EFU or VTI?

EFU has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EFU or VTI?

Over the past year EFU returned -25.10% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EFU annualized -20.03% vs +9.31% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EFU or VTI?

EFU has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 16.1% for VTI.

Should I hold both EFU and VTI?

EFU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EFU or VTI?

EFU yields 5.17% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EFU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than EFU?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.81, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.