EGGQ vs IVV
NestYield Visionary ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EGGQ or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGGQ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $84M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.26% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 45 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -1.14% | +12.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.14% | +14.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.4% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,233 | $13,164Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.9% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | NestYield | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 (1.8 years).
EGGQ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
EGGQ vs IVV Performance
NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is an ETF from NestYield and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EGGQ returned -4.14% while IVV returned +14.42%. Year to date, EGGQ is down 1.14% versus a gain of 12.15% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.4% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for EGGQ and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGGQ charges 0.93% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGQ currently yields 8.26% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
75.4% of EGGQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.9% of IVV's money is in holdings EGGQ also owns.
Most of EGGQ is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
15 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 506 in IVV, against full books of 45 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EGGQ (89.6% of the fund), and 6 for EGGQ that do not appear in IVV (16.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EGGQ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 10.74% | 0.14% | 10.60% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 10.52% | 0.32% | 10.20% |
| BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A | 9.67% | 0.12% | 9.55% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.50% | 1.87% | 3.63% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.75% | 3.00% | 0.75% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.84% | 1.52% | 3.32% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 5.39% | 0.25% | 5.14% |
| SNDKVSandisk Corp. | 3.72% | 0.39% | 3.33% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 3.96% | 0.14% | 3.82% |
| COHRCoherent, Inc | 3.74% | 0.09% | 3.65% |
75.4% of EGGQ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGGQ or IVV?
EGGQ has an expense ratio of 0.93% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $90 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGGQ or IVV?
Over the past year EGGQ returned -4.14% vs +14.42% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGQ annualized +11.85% vs +16.50% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGGQ or IVV?
EGGQ has been the more volatile fund at 38.4% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EGGQ -33.9% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both EGGQ and IVV?
EGGQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EGGQ and IVV?
75.4% of EGGQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.9% of IVV's is in holdings EGGQ also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGGQ or IVV?
EGGQ yields 8.26% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EGGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EGGQ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.