EGGQ vs VTI

EGGQ vs VTI

Which is better, EGGQ or VTI?

Each has led over a different period.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEGGQVTI
Expense Ratio0.93%0.03%Best
AUM$84M$689.2B
Dividend Yield8.26%1.06%
Holdings453,524
YTD Return+7.64%+13.43%Best
1Y Return-1.74%+13.28%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.15%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.35%
Volatility (annualized)36.3%12.5%Best
Max Drawdown-33.9%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.8 years$13,278Best$13,219
Top 10 Weight63.9%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyNestYieldVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 26, 2024May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2024 to Oct 29, 2026 (1.8 years).

EGGQ vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

EGGQ vs VTI Performance

NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is an ETF from NestYield and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EGGQ returned -1.74% while VTI returned +13.28%. Year to date, EGGQ is up 7.64% versus a gain of 13.43% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EGGQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.3% compared with 12.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for EGGQ and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EGGQ charges 0.93% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGQ currently yields 8.26% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

EGGQ already in VTI82.4%
VTI already in EGGQ8.5%

82.4% of EGGQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.5% of VTI's money is in holdings EGGQ also owns.

Most of EGGQ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

19 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 45 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,138 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EGGQ (89.3% of the fund), and 3 for EGGQ that do not appear in VTI (10.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EGGQWeight in VTIDifference
LITELumentum Holdings Inc10.74%0.10%10.64%
STXSeagate Technolo10.52%0.25%10.27%
BECfd Bloom Energy Corp- A9.67%0.08%9.59%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.50%1.46%4.04%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.75%2.70%1.05%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc4.84%1.04%3.80%
WDCWestern Digital Corp.5.39%0.21%5.18%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co3.96%0.13%3.83%
SNDKVSandisk Corp.3.72%0.31%3.41%
COHRCoherent, Inc3.74%0.07%3.67%

82.4% of EGGQ is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

EGGQVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EGGQ or VTI?

EGGQ has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $90 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EGGQ or VTI?

Over the past year EGGQ returned -1.74% vs +13.28% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGQ annualized +17.06% vs +16.77% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EGGQ or VTI?

EGGQ has been the more volatile fund at 36.3% annualized versus 12.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EGGQ -33.9% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both EGGQ and VTI?

EGGQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between EGGQ and VTI?

82.4% of EGGQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 8.5% of VTI's is in holdings EGGQ also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in EGGQ and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, EGGQ or VTI?

EGGQ yields 8.26% while VTI yields 1.06%, so EGGQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than EGGQ?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. EGGQ led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.