ELCV vs TYLG
Eventide High Dividend ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
ELCV has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 78 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ELCV | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $262M | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.15% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +19.57% | +21.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.61% | +35.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Eventide | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2024 | Nov 21, 2022 |
ELCV vs TYLG Performance
Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) is a ETF from Eventide and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year ELCV returned +25.61% while TYLG returned +35.64%. Year to date, ELCV is up 19.57% versus a gain of 21.18% for TYLG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 13.8% for ELCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for ELCV and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ELCV charges 0.49% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $60 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ELCV currently yields 2.15% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
ELCV and TYLG share 10 holdings out of 110 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ELCV or TYLG?
ELCV has an expense ratio of 0.49% while TYLG charges 0.60%. ELCV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ELCV or TYLG?
Over the past year ELCV returned +25.61% vs +35.64% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ELCV annualized +15.37% vs +25.12% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ELCV or TYLG?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 13.8% for ELCV. Worst drawdown: ELCV -18.4% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both ELCV and TYLG?
ELCV and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ELCV and TYLG?
ELCV and TYLG share 10 common holdings with a 9.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 110 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ELCV or TYLG?
ELCV yields 2.15% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.