EMBX vs QQQ
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EMBX or QQQ?
Emerging Markets Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMBX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $257M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.64% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 138 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +2.90% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.05% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Emerging Markets Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2012 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMBX vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMBX vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX) is an ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EMBX returned +6.05% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, EMBX is up 2.90% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMBX charges 0.76% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $18 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMBX currently yields 4.64% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in EMBX and 102 in QQQ, totalling 5.5% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in EMBX and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 138 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMBX and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMBX or QQQ?
EMBX has an expense ratio of 0.76% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMBX or QQQ?
Over the past year EMBX returned +6.05% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMBX or QQQ?
EMBX yields 4.64% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EMBX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EMBX?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.