EMBX vs VXUS
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, EMBX or VXUS?
Emerging Markets Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMBX | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $257M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.64% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 138 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +2.90% | +12.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.05% | +19.86%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.46% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Emerging Markets Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMBX vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMBX vs VXUS Performance
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMBX returned +6.05% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, EMBX is up 2.90% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMBX charges 0.76% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $5 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMBX currently yields 4.64% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in EMBX and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 5.5% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in EMBX and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 138 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMBX and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMBX or VXUS?
EMBX has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMBX or VXUS?
Over the past year EMBX returned +6.05% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMBX or VXUS?
EMBX yields 4.64% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so EMBX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than EMBX?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.