EMBX vs VTI
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMBX or VTI?
Emerging Markets Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMBX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $257M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.64% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 138 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.90% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.05% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Emerging Markets Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMBX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMBX vs VTI Performance
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBX) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMBX returned +6.05% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, EMBX is up 2.90% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMBX charges 0.76% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMBX currently yields 4.64% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 12 holdings in EMBX and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 5.5% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 12 positions we hold weights for in EMBX and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 138 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMBX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMBX or VTI?
EMBX has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMBX or VTI?
Over the past year EMBX returned +6.05% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMBX or VTI?
EMBX yields 4.64% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EMBX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMBX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.