EMCS vs SCHD
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, EMCS or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y and 3Y, SCHD over 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCS | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 67 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +26.95% | +28.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +48.89%Best | +31.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.08%Best | +16.70% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.46% | +10.09%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 16.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.9% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,009 | $16,171Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.7% | 41.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2018 to Sep 3, 2026 (7.7 years).
EMCS vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.7 years both funds cover.
EMCS vs SCHD Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMCS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EMCS returned +48.89% while SCHD returned +31.77%. Year to date, EMCS is up 26.95% versus a gain of 28.59% for SCHD.
Over three years, EMCS compounded at +27.08% per year against +16.70% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +8.46% and +10.09% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +12.80% annualized vs +10.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 16.2% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.9% for EMCS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCS charges 0.15% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $6 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCS currently yields 1.61% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 63 holdings in EMCS and 100 in SCHD, totalling 98.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in EMCS and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 67 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for EMCS (99.9% of the fund), and 1 for EMCS that do not appear in SCHD (1.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMCS and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCS or SCHD?
EMCS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMCS or SCHD?
Over the past year EMCS returned +48.89% vs +31.77% for SCHD, so EMCS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCS annualized +10.29% vs +12.80% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMCS or SCHD?
EMCS has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 16.2% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EMCS -44.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EMCS and SCHD?
EMCS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCS or SCHD?
EMCS yields 1.61% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than EMCS?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y and 3Y, SCHD over 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.