EMCS vs VOO
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMCS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $989M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +23.44% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.02% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.15% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.57% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMCS vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMCS) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMCS returned +44.02% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, EMCS is up 23.44% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, EMCS compounded at +26.15% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.57% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.9% for EMCS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCS charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCS currently yields 1.61% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EMCS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 568 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCS or VOO?
EMCS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMCS or VOO?
Over the past year EMCS returned +44.02% vs +21.79% for VOO, so EMCS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCS annualized +9.96% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMCS or VOO?
EMCS has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMCS -44.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMCS and VOO?
EMCS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMCS and VOO?
EMCS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 568 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCS or VOO?
EMCS yields 1.61% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EMCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.