EMCS vs VYM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EMCS or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 67 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +26.95%Best | +15.29% |
| 1Y Return | +48.89%Best | +22.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.08%Best | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.46% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.9% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,009 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.7% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2018 to Sep 3, 2026 (7.7 years).
EMCS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.7 years both funds cover.
EMCS vs VYM Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMCS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMCS returned +48.89% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, EMCS is up 26.95% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, EMCS compounded at +27.08% per year against +18.81% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.46% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +11.36% annualized vs +10.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.9% for EMCS and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCS charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCS currently yields 1.61% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.4% of EMCS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings EMCS also owns.
EMCS and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in EMCS and 603 in VYM, against full books of 67 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EMCS (97.3% of the fund), and 0 for EMCS that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMCS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCCOSouthern Copper Corp | 1.44% | 0.07% | 1.37% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMCS and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCS or VYM?
EMCS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMCS or VYM?
Over the past year EMCS returned +48.89% vs +22.23% for VYM, so EMCS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCS annualized +10.29% vs +11.36% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMCS or VYM?
EMCS has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EMCS -44.9% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both EMCS and VYM?
EMCS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMCS and VYM?
1.4% of EMCS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings EMCS also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in EMCS and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCS or VYM?
EMCS yields 1.61% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EMCS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.