EMCS vs VTI
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMCS or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 67 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +29.44%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +51.92%Best | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.88%Best | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.72% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 16.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.9% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,190 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2018 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.7 years).
EMCS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.7 years both funds cover.
EMCS vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMCS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMCS returned +51.92% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, EMCS is up 29.44% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, EMCS compounded at +27.88% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.72% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +15.07% annualized vs +10.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 16.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.9% for EMCS and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCS charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCS currently yields 1.61% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 63 holdings in EMCS and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 98.9% and 92.3% of the two funds. That is not enough of VTI to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in EMCS and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 67 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMCS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPGPPg Photonics Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMCS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCS or VTI?
EMCS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMCS or VTI?
Over the past year EMCS returned +51.92% vs +20.00% for VTI, so EMCS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCS annualized +10.56% vs +15.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMCS or VTI?
EMCS has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 16.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMCS -44.9% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EMCS and VTI?
EMCS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCS or VTI?
EMCS yields 1.61% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMCS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.